Select Page

Curtiss Condor Bomber and Civilian Condor

Curtiss Condor Bomber and Civilian Condor
A 1929 black and white photo of a Curtis Condor bomber

This original photo of the Curtiss Condor B-2 bomber was taken at the Curtiss Aerospace development plant in Garden City, N.Y. The image is dated Aug. 14, 1929. (Photo from the Paul S. Maynard archive)

The Curtiss Condor B-2 bomber became known as a ‘Flying Battleship’

BY MARK MAYNARD

Long before the current-generation B2 Spirit “Stealth Bomber” by Northrop Grumman there was the Curtiss Condor B-2 bomber built for the U.S. Army.

It was an enormous fabric-covered biplane aircraft with a wingspan of 90 feet and a length of 47 feet 4 inches. With its armaments, it became known as a “Flying Battleship,” but its use was short-lived.

According to its page in Wikipedia, the B-2 Condor’s two engines sat in nacelles between the wings, flanking the fuselage. It had a twin set of rudders on a twin tail, a configuration that was becoming obsolete by that time. At the rear of each nacelle was a gunner position. And there was another gunner in the nose.

As a twin-engine heavy bomber, the B-2 Condor was powered by two 650-horsepower Curtiss GV-1570-7 Conqueror V-12 water-cooled piston engines.

In a report by Joe Baugher (Encyclopedia of American Aircraft), the engines were housed inside nacelles mounted on top of the lower wing. “The engines were cooled by rather angular radiators that jutted up vertically from each nacelle.

“One of the more unusual innovations introduced by the [second prototype] XB-2 was the addition of a defensive gunner position in the rear of each nacelle. It was hoped that this arrangement would offer a clearer field of fire for the gunners than the more conventional fuselage-situated positions. An additional gunner position was provided in the nose. Each position was provided with a pair of Lewis .30-06 machine guns.”

According to the Baugher report, the Condor’s bombload was typically 2,508 pounds but could be increased to 4,000 pounds on short flights.

Curtiss Condor Competitors

The Curtiss Condor B-2 competed against the Keystone XB-1B, the Keystone XLB-6, the Sikorsky S-37B, and the Atlantic-Fokker XLB-2, according to the Baugher report.

“When an Army board of review met in February of 1928 to decide which design was to be awarded a contract, they immediately ruled out the XB-1B, the XLB-2, and the S-37. However, the board was unable to decide between the XB-2 and the XLB-6. The XB-2 had the better performance, but the XLB-6 was only $24,750 per unit.

“The per-unit cost of the B-2 was $76,373, more than three times the cost of a Keystone bomber. In a split decision, the Board opted for the Keystone design, but on June 23, 1928, Curtiss was given a contract for two B-2s (Serial nos. 28-398/399). A further 10 were ordered in 1929 (29-28/37).

“The twelve production B-2s were delivered from May 1929 to January 1930. Notable differences from the XB-2 included the use of three-bladed propellers and somewhat shorter and wider radiators mounted on top of the engine nacelles.

At sea level, the Curtiss Condor had a maximum speed of 132 mph — though many reports say it struggled to reach that max V — and 128 mph at 5,000 feet. The plane had a cruising speed of 105.5 mph and a cruising range of 805 miles.

End of the Condor Line

During the early 1930s, the advances in bomber design were so rapid that canvas-covered biplanes such as the B-2 rapidly became obsolete, Baugher wrote.

“Consequently, the B-2 served only briefly with the Army, being taken out of service in 1934. The last B-2 was surveyed in July of 1936. So far as I am aware, none survives today.”

After production of the B-2, Curtiss Aircraft left the bomber business, concentrating on the Hawk series of pursuit aircraft in the 1930s.

A 1929 black and white photo of a civilian version of the Curtis Condor bomber

The civilian version of the Curtiss Condor, circa 1944,  was the first airliner in the world to provide sleeping berths. (Photo from the Paul S. Maynard archive)

The Civilian Curtiss Condor

The Model 53 was an airliner version of the Model 52 Condor B-2 bomber. The Condor was the first airliner in the world to provide sleeping berths.

The Army permitted this development in 1928, and the first of the new aircraft made its maiden flight in June 1929. The civilian B-2 was an 18-seat passenger aircraft called the Condor 18 (also known as the Condor T32), according to HistoryOfWar.org.

At the time, there was a need for sleeper-transports, and the simplicity of design allowed for quick production and delivery to serve this market, according to HistoryOfWar. The Curtiss Condor could carry 12 passengers as a sleeper-transport or 15 passengers for day transport.

Luxury Cabin Accommodations

The Condor was the first multi-engine airliner with an electrically operated retractable landing gear. To help absorb vibration, the Condor was the first to have its engines mounted on rubber bushings.

The passenger cabin was appointed in fabric and leather, and each seat had individual hot and cold air vents.

The lavatory featured a basin with hot and cold running water, a mirror, and a vanity. However, the Condor remained in airline service for only three years, making it the last biplane purchased for civil transport.

Only a short time afterward, the all-metal airliners, the Boeing 247 and Douglas DC-1, made their debut in 1933. The only competing factor that the Condor had with the modern airplanes was that it had retractable landing gear.

Two 710 hp Wright SCR-1820-F3 Cyclone, 9-cylinder radial engines powered the passenger Condor.

Condor Flight History

The first civilian Condor converted from a military Model 52, flew for the first time on July 21, 1929. Including the prototype, six were built. Of these, the first three were converted from bomber model 52s. They operated with TAT and Eastern Air Line, though only for about a year. The Conqueror’s development was never quite completed, and in 1932 the US Army, after spending large sums on it, withdrew support and turned to air-cooled engines.

CURTISS B-2 CONDOR SPECIFICATIONS

Twin-engine heavy bomber biplane. Initial production version; 12 built.

Crew: 5; two wing gunners, the nose gunner, pilot, and co-pilot.

Length: 47 feet 4 inches

Wingspan: 90 feet

Empty weight: 9,300 pounds

Gross weight: 16,951 pounds

Powerplant: 2 × Curtiss GV-1570-7 Conqueror V-12 water-cooled piston engine, 600 hp each

PERFORMANCE

Maximum speed: 132 mph

Cruising speed: 105.5 mph

Range: 805 miles

Service ceiling: 17,100 feet

Rate of climb: 850 feet/minute

ARMAMENT

Guns: 6 .30-06 caliber Lewis machine-guns

Bombload: 2,508 pounds

Note: This is another image from my dad, Paul Smith Maynard, who worked four decades in aviation as an engineer. Dad began his career in about 1943 after graduating from West Virginia University. He started with Curtiss-Wright Corp., a pioneer in making flying machines. He went on to work at North American Aviation and Rockwell International.

See more of his vintage plane pics here.

 

Curtiss-Bleecker SX-5-1 Helicopter

Curtiss-Bleecker SX-5-1 Helicopter
Curtiss-Bleecker Helicopter on the runway at Curtiss Wright in Garden City, N.Y.

The Curtiss-Bleecker Helicopter, shown in 1930 at the Curtiss-Wright R&D facility in Garden Grove, Long Island, N.Y. Designer Maitland Bleecker stands with his aircraft. (Photo from the Paul S. Maynard archive)

The 1926 Curtiss-Bleecker Helicopter was an American prototype rotary wing aircraft that just didn’t fly, at least long enough for production

BY MARK MAYNARD

Looking like an escapee from a “Mad Max” movie, the Curtiss-Bleecker Helicopter was an American prototype rotary wing aircraft that was introduced in 1926, according to its page in Wikipedia.

Maitland B. Bleecker, a junior engineer from the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, designed the Curtiss-Bleecker Helicopter. Curtiss Wright constructed the two-seat aircraft for $250,000 over four years at it development facility in Garden City, Long Island, N.Y.

The aircraft featured a rotary wing design with a single engine. Each rotor, painted silver and yellow, had an individual propeller for thrust. Thrust was distributed from the centrally mounted engine through shafts to propellers mounted on each rotor blade.

A trailing control surface called a “stabovator” changes the pitch of the rotor. The aircraft was controlled by a stick that operated like a modern helicopter collective control. Yaw was controlled with a “Spin Vane” that used downwash from the rotor to pivot the aircraft with foot pedals.

The aircraft’s first flight was in 1926. However, testing on the Bleecker Helicopter was stopped after the failure of a drive shaft on a test flight in 1929. By 1933 the project was abandoned following vibrational issues in further tests.

The Garden City Curtiss-Wright plant closed in 1932 during the depression. Some machines were moved to Buffalo, N.Y. Others remained at Garden City and were sold off from time to time, up to 1935 or 1936, according to a legal case filed by Garden City.

Maitland Bleecker was 99 when he died on Oct. 19, 2002.

CURTISS-BLEECKER HELICOPTER SPECIFICATIONS

Seats: 2

Wing area of rotor blades: 370 sq. ft.

Empty weight: 2,800 pounds

Gross weight: 3,400 pounds

Fuel capacity: 30 U.S. gallons

Powerplant: 1 420-hp Pratt & Whitney Wasp radial piston

PERFORMANCE

Maximum speed: 70 mph

Rate of climb: 1,000 ft/min

Curtiss Goupil Duck

Curtiss Goupil Duck

The birdlike design of the 1917 Curtiss Goupil Duck was based on a monoplane glider by French engineer Alexandre Goupil in 1883

A blackl and white photo of a 1917 Curtiss-Goupil Duck, which was quite birdlike in design.

The 1917 Curtiss Goupil Duck became a patent battleground between aerospace founder Glenn Curtiss and the Wright Brothers. World War I settled the matter. (Photo from the Paul S. Maynard archive)

BY MARK MAYNARD

My dad, Paul Smith Maynard, worked for nearly four decades in aviation as an engineer. His specialty was metals, or metallurgy. Among his tasks was to determine at what point a metal part would fail. He experimented with new, lightweight metals and honeycombed metals that were lighter but strong. He evolved into rocketry, so I consider my dad a rocket scientist, though he would decline that attribute.

Dad began his career in about 1943 after graduating from West Virginia University. He started with Curtiss-Wright Corp., an early pioneer in making flying machines. It was founded by Glenn Curtiss, the father of naval aviation, and the Wright brothers, renowned for history’s first flight. Dad worked at the plant in Columbus, Ohio, where I was born in 1954.

Post-World War II, Curtiss-Wright shut down its Aeroplane Division in 1948 and sold the assets to North American Aviation. Dad was among the assets moved to NAA, which was a leader in aerospace contracts. It eventually would merge again and become Rockwell International, also in Columbus.

Occasionally, dad would bring home glossy PR photos of airplanes and prototype or maybe a chunk of some special metal. Lately, I’ve been going through his boxes of work paperwork and found a trove of early warplanes and other prototypes from Curtiss-Wright to Rockwell.

Among the pictures was this black-and-white image of a 1917 Curtiss Goupil Duck on floats. It emerged during a pissing match between Glenn Curtiss and the Wright Bros. The Wrights felt that certain elements of wing design fell under their patent of 1906, based on “wing warping.”

The Patent Battle

With their patent, the Wrights hoped to gain a monopoly on manned flight. The patent would require anyone building aircraft to pay a royalty to them. It is a fascinating story, well told by Airways magazine.

In 1908, Glenn Curtiss sought to circumvent the Wright’s patent by using ailerons, rather than wing warping. Ailerons use moveable flaps in the wings, which are considered more efficient and simpler for lateral control.
Among my dad’s photos was this 1917 Curtiss Goupil Duck, which used a design by French engineer Alexandre Doupil’s birdlike monoplane glider from 1883.

The plane was never developed. At the start of World War I, the U.S. government persuaded Wright to release the patent for combat aircraft to be developed.

Boeing KC-97G Stratofreighter

Boeing KC-97G Stratofreighter
A 1953 black and white image of a Boeing KC 97G Stratofreighter on takeoff, exhaust spewing from its four engines.

According to Wikipedia, the KC-97 Stratofreighter was an aerial refueling tanker variant of the C-97 Stratofreighter. (Photo from the Paul S. Maynard archive)

Cleared for Takeoff!

Boeing KC-97G Stratofreighter 

BY MARK MAYNARD

This circa 1953 photo appears to show a big Boeing KC-97G “Stratofreighter.” According to the Museum of Aviation at Robins Air Force Base in Georgia, its wingspan was 141 feet, 2 inches, and it was powered by four Pratt & Whitney R-4360s of 3,500 hp each and two General Electric J47s of 5,970 lbs. thrust each.

At 117 feet, 5 inches long with a height of 38 feet, 4 inches, the plane weighed 153,000 lbs. max. and was capable of cruising at 230 mph with a top speed of 400 mph and had a range of 2,300 miles.

According to Wikipedia, the KC-97 Stratofreighter was an aerial refueling tanker variant of the C-97 Stratofreighter, based on the Boeing B-29 Superfortress.

The U.S. Air Force began operating the KC-97 in 1950.

“[The plane’s] cavernous upper deck was capable of accommodating oversize cargo accessed through a very large right-side door. Transferable jet fuel was contained in tanks on the lower deck (G-L models). Both decks were heated and pressurized for high-altitude operations. The boom operator lay prone, viewing operations through a window at the bottom of the tail, a configuration later used on the KC-135.

The KC-97G had a dual role of aerial refueling tankers (underwing fuel tanks) and cargo transport. In addition to the plane’s aviation gasoline for the piston engines, the tanker also carried jet fuel for its refueling mission.

“While it was an effective tanker, the KC-97’s slow speed and low operational altitude complicated refueling operations with jet aircraft,” according to the Wiki report. “B-52s typically lowered their flaps and rear landing gear to slow the aircraft enough to refuel from the KC-97.”

There were 592 KC-97G models built.

The Ford Trimotor ‘Tin Goose’

The Ford Trimotor ‘Tin Goose’

An photograph of a Ford Trimotor "Tin Goose"

A Ford Trimotor sits along the grassy edge of a dirt airfield. The location is unidentified in this vintage photograph, but it is likely to be somewhere along the West Coast.

The year is sometime between 1925 and 1933. This three-engine transport aircraft was in production by Ford Motor Co.’s aircraft division.

Nicknamed the “Tin Goose,” the trimotor was designed for civil aviation market (passenger use).  But it also could haul cargo (with seats removed) and the plane saw some military service.

“The original (commercial production) 4-AT had three air-cooled Wright radial engines, according to Wikipedia. “It carried a crew of three: a pilot, a copilot and a stewardess. And there were seats for eight or nine passengers. The later 5-AT had more powerful Pratt & Whitney engines.

All models had an aluminum corrugated sheet-metal body and wings. The metallic construction made it “the safest airliner around,” Henry Ford said.

“In the early 1920s, Henry Ford, along with a group of 19 other investors including his son Edsel, invested in the Stout Metal Airplane Company,” according to the Wiki report. “Stout, a bold and imaginative salesman, sent a mimeographed form letter to leading manufacturers, blithely asking for $1,000 and adding: ‘For your one thousand dollars you will get one definite promise: You will never get your money back.’  Stout raised $20,000, including $1,000 each from Edsel and Henry Ford.

“In 1925, Ford bought Stout and its aircraft designs. The single-engined Stout monoplane was turned into a trimotor, the Stout 3-AT with three Curtiss-Wright air-cooled radial engines.

A total of 199 Ford Trimotors were made between 1926 and 1933.

See these authentic PR images from manufacturer archives

2019 Ford Mustang Bullitt Review

2019 Ford Mustang Bullitt Review

History In the Remaking

The iconic 2019 Mustang Bullitt traces its roots to the legendary Highland Green 1968 Mustang GT fastback Steve McQueen thrashed in the action thriller “Bullitt” 50 years ago. (Photos courtesy of Ford Motor)

BY MARK MAYNARD

The 2019 Ford Mustang Bullitt is now in its third sequel and getting better with every evolution.

Ford has made a mini-franchise out of limited-edition Bullitt models that pay tribute to the fastback’s film debut in 1968 with Steve McQueen at the wheel. The now-legendary “Bullitt” film came out 50 years ago on Oct. 15.

I was in the theater then, a car-crazed 14-year-old. After that death-defying car chase with the bad guys in a 1968 Dodge Charger 440 Magnum, I pledged allegiance to the Mustang — a 390 GT 2+2 fastback.

The cabin is compact but quite functional, with much Bullitt jewelry.

The chase lasted just 10 minutes 53 seconds but lives in infamy, in part to Ford’s Bullitt Mustang marketing. Tug on your driving gloves for the 2019 version, which was preceded by movie-tribute models in 2001 and 2008.

2019 Bullit Pricing

Complete with classic cue ball shifter, the 2019 Bullitt builds on the latest Mustang GT Premium with Performance Package, but with a little more power.

The classic cue ball shifter.

Pricing starts at $47,495, including the $900 freight charge from Flat Rock, Mich. Exterior paint choices are limited to Shadow Black and the classic Dark Highland Green. And there are just three factory-installed options:

Bullitt Electronics Package, $2,100, which includes navigation, driver memory seat and mirrors, upgraded sound system and Blind Spot Information System with Cross-Traffic Alert;

 MagneRide semi-active suspension, $1,695;

Recaro black leather-trimmed seats, $1,595.

Classic Bullitt Styling

The Highland Green tester included all three options for a total of $52,885. The Recaro seats were supportive and not severely bolstered as to complicate easy entry or jean-scraping wear. But I’d also prefer a seat with lumbar adjustment; these are one size fits most.

The 19-inch Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Tires (summer only) make every sports car better as does the MagneRide adaptive suspension upgrade (rather than the standard heavy-duty steel springs). It is not a harsh ride and, likely, helps the car adhere when pushed hard on lumpy surfaces.

Performance modes, including drift.

Other Bullitt features include a dashboard badge with chassis number, chrome accents around the grille and front windows, 19-inch five spoke heritage aluminum wheels, red painted Brembo brakes and its own black grille.

The leather-trimmed interior features unique green accent stitching on the dashboard, door panels, center console and seats.

Ford says it is a limited edition, but gives no tally of cars to be built. Possibly 1,968? Or as many as can be sold for $50,000.

Mustang Bullitt Power

The 480-horsepower 5.0-liter V-8 was uprated with a performance open-air intake, Mustang Shelby GT350 intake manifold, a larger 87-mm throttle body and a tweaked control module. Horsepower is 20-up from the Mustang GT and peak torque is the same at 420 foot-pounds but at 4,800 rpm vs 4,600 rpm. Its top speed of 163 mph is an 8-mph boost, for those who dare. But it is the bellow of the active black NitroPlate quad-tip exhaust that is the siren song. It is manufactured sound, but more super-stock than factory and never obnoxious.

The Bullitt model has huge Brembo front brake discs of 15 inches

The Brembo front brake discs are 15 inches. The rear brakes are 13 inches. Both are vented.

With a curb weight of 3,743 pounds, it’s good for 0-60 mph in 4 seconds, according to magazine results. Fuel economy numbers are 15 mpg city, 25 highway, and 18 mpg combined. Premium fuel is required for peak power and mpgs.

The 19-inch Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Tires are part of the Performance pack.

The 19-inch Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Tires are part of the Performance pack.

The only transmission is a sweet-shifting six-speed manual with a light clutch, smooth engagement, and ideal gear ratios for creeping in traffic in second and third. A hill holder function of the ABS takes away the fret of uphill starts. I did not miss a shift or stall the car once in my week. And this is the same clutch and gearing in the basic Mustang GT performance pack. The only other difference is the shift knob.

You can “build” a comparably equipped Mustang GT for about a thousand dollars less, but the Bullitt might have more collector value down the road because it is history in the remaking. Just imagine the damage McQueen could have done with this badass Bullitt.

The 'Bullitt' V8 engine

The 480-horsepower 5.0-liter V-8 was uprated with a performance open air intake, Mustang Shelby GT350 intake manifold, a larger 87-mm throttle body, and a tweaked control module.

2019 Ford Mustang Bullitt Specifications

Body style: compact, 4-passenger, rear-wheel drive coupe

Engine: 480-hp, 5.0-liter V-8; 420 lb.-ft. torque at 4,800 rpm

Transmission: 6-speed manual w/rev-matching downshifts

Fuel economy: 15/25/18 mpg city/hwy/combined; premium fuel

Bullitt features include a dashboard badge with chassis number

Bullitt features include a dashboard badge with chassis number.

BY THE NUMBERS

Fuel tank: 16 gallons

Trunk space: 13.5 cu. ft.

Front head/leg room: 37.6/45.1 inches

Rear head/leg room: 34.8/2913.5 inches

Length/wheelbase: 188.5/107.1 inches

Curb weight: 3,743 pounds

2019 PRICING

Base price: $47,495, including $900 freight charge; price as tested $52,885

Options on test car: Bullitt Electronics Package, $2,100, which includes navigation, driver memory seats and mirrors, upgraded sound system and Blind Spot Information System with Cross-Traffic Alert; MagneRide semi-active suspension, $1,695; Recaro black leather-trimmed seats, $1,595.

Where assembled: Flat Rock, Mich.

A rear view of the iconic green Bullitt mustang

Inside and out, the 2019 Ford Mustang Bullitt has minimal badging; only the circular faux gas cap Bullitt logo on the rear center is visible on the exterior.